Mobile Application Testing
Top TestFlight Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

TestFlight makes it easy to invite users to test your apps and App Clips and collect valuable feedback before releasing your apps on the App Store. You can invite up to 10,000 testers using just their email address or by sharing a public link.

8.5

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

45

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to TestFlight

Compare how TestFlight stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

Apple

Xcode

8.7

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

54

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, Xcode is:

More Efficient

More Innovative

More Respectful

More Reliable

Better at Integrating

Less Caring

Appium

Appium

8.6

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

55

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, Appium is:

More Innovative

More Efficient

Less Caring

Worse at Support

Harder to Use

Worse at Training

SmartBear Software

TestComplete

8.6

Composite
Score

+88

Emotional
Footprint

49

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, TestComplete is:

Easier to Customize

More Inspiring

Less Caring

Less Reliable

Harder to Use

Worse at Support

Idera Software

TestRail

8.5

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

37

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, TestRail is:

More Efficient

Harder to Customize

Worse at Support

Harder to Use

Worse at Training

Harder to Implement

BrowserStack

BrowserStack App Automate

8.3

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

37

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, BrowserStack App Automate is:

More Efficient

More Innovative

Easier to Customize

More Respectful

More Reliable

Less Transparent

Test IO

Test IO

8.3

Composite
Score

+96

Emotional
Footprint

14

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, Test IO is:

More Inspiring

More Efficient

Better at Training

Easier to Customize

More Respectful

Easier to Implement

Amazon

AWS Device Farm

8.2

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

32

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, AWS Device Farm is:

More Efficient

More Innovative

More Respectful

More Reliable

Better at Integrating

Easier to Customize

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

7.7

Composite
Score

+87

Emotional
Footprint

27

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, Sauce Labs is:

More Efficient

Less Caring

Less Innovative

Worse at Training

Worse at Support

Harder to Customize

Digital.ai

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

7.7

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

24

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, Digital.ai Continuous Testing is:

More Efficient

Less Respectful

Harder to Use

Worse at Training

Harder to Customize

Less Transparent

Kobiton

Kobiton

7.6

Composite
Score

+74

Emotional
Footprint

63

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, Kobiton is:

Less Inspiring

Less Reliable

Less Innovative

Harder to Use

Worse at Support

Less Caring

HeadSpin

HeadSpin

7.6

Composite
Score

+86

Emotional
Footprint

21

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, HeadSpin is:

More Efficient

More Respectful

Less Transparent

Less Innovative

Less Reliable

Less Caring

Perfecto Mobile

Perfecto Mobile

7.5

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

22

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, Perfecto Mobile is:

More Efficient

More Inspiring

Less Caring

Harder to Customize

Harder to Use

Harder to Implement

Testlio

Testlio

7.5

Composite
Score

+81

Emotional
Footprint

15

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, Testlio is:

Better at Support

Less Respectful

Less Caring

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Less Efficient

Applause

Applause

6.9

Composite
Score

+79

Emotional
Footprint

14

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to TestFlight, Applause is:

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Less Respectful

Less Efficient

Harder to Use

Less Reliable

Most Popular TestFlight Comparisons