Content Collaboration
Top M-Files Content Collaboration Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

M-Files is the only knowledge work automation platform that organizes content based on what it is, not where it's stored. You can even connect to existing network folders and systems to make them more intelligent with built-in Generative AI to automatically categorize and protect information. By embedding automation and GenAI into its core, M-Files' platform not only increases efficiencies for organizations but also empowers knowledge workers to focus on what truly matters—innovation and strategic growth. With 10 global offices, M-Files serves more than 5,000 customers in 100 countries. Start a Free Trial: https://bit.ly/3NYze9K OR Book a Demo: https://bit.ly/4es8vNK

9.1

Composite
Score

+99

Emotional
Footprint

56

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to M-Files Content Collaboration

Compare how M-Files Content Collaboration stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

Box

Box

9.1

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

265

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to M-Files Content Collaboration, Box is:

Easier to Implement

Less Innovative

Less Inspiring

Less Transparent

Less Efficient

Less Respectful

Google

Google Drive

9.0

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

1408

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to M-Files Content Collaboration, Google Drive is:

Worse at Training

Less Innovative

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

Less Caring

Worse at Support

Dropbox

Dropbox Business

9.0

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

702

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to M-Files Content Collaboration, Dropbox Business is:

Less Innovative

Less Caring

Less Reliable

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

TeamDrive Systems GmbH

TeamDrive

8.9

Composite
Score

+99

Emotional
Footprint

23

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to M-Files Content Collaboration, TeamDrive is:

Easier to Implement

Better at Integrating

Better at Support

Easier to Use

More Transparent

Harder to Customize

Microsoft Corporation

Microsoft OneDrive for Business

8.9

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

323

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to M-Files Content Collaboration, Microsoft OneDrive for Business is:

Less Innovative

Less Caring

Less Respectful

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

Less Transparent

ShareFile

ShareFile

8.9

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

60

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to M-Files Content Collaboration, ShareFile is:

Easier to Implement

Less Reliable

Less Caring

Less Innovative

Less Respectful

Worse at Support

Zoho

Zoho WorkDrive

8.7

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

49

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to M-Files Content Collaboration, Zoho WorkDrive is:

Less Respectful

Worse at Training

Less Innovative

Less Caring

Worse at Support

Less Reliable

MyWorkDrive

MyWorkDrive

8.7

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

46

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to M-Files Content Collaboration, MyWorkDrive is:

Better at Support

More Transparent

More Efficient

More Caring

Harder to Implement

Worse at Training

Nextcloud GmbH

NextCloud Files

8.5

Composite
Score

+96

Emotional
Footprint

26

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to M-Files Content Collaboration, NextCloud Files is:

Better at Integrating

Easier to Implement

Easier to Customize

Easier to Use

Less Inspiring

Less Reliable

Egnyte

Egnyte

8.5

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

32

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to M-Files Content Collaboration, Egnyte is:

Easier to Implement

Better at Integrating

Easier to Use

Easier to Customize

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Most Popular M-Files Content Collaboration Comparisons