Cloud Infrastructure as a Service
Top IBM Cloud Bare Metal Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

IBM Cloud™ Bare Metal Servers are single-tenant physical servers that provide you performance and control with low-level access to the hardware resources. Your server isn’t shared with “noisy neighbors,” it’s all yours!

8.4

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

40

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to IBM Cloud Bare Metal

Compare how IBM Cloud Bare Metal stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

Amazon

Amazon EC2

9.1

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

582

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Cloud Bare Metal, Amazon EC2 is:

More Respectful

Easier to Customize

More Reliable

Better at Integrating

Less Transparent

Less Caring

Microsoft Corporation

Microsoft Azure Virtual Machines

9.0

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

316

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Cloud Bare Metal, Microsoft Azure Virtual Machines is:

More Respectful

Better at Training

Easier to Customize

Less Caring

Less Efficient

Less Transparent

Google

Google Cloud

9.0

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

529

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Cloud Bare Metal, Google Cloud is:

More Respectful

More Reliable

Better at Integrating

Better at Training

Less Efficient

Worse at Support

Oracle

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure

8.8

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

70

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Cloud Bare Metal, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure is:

More Respectful

More Reliable

Less Efficient

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

Worse at Integrating

DigitalOcean

DigitalOcean

8.2

Composite
Score

+87

Emotional
Footprint

47

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Cloud Bare Metal, DigitalOcean is:

Less Inspiring

Less Transparent

Less Efficient

Worse at Training

Worse at Support

Less Caring

OpenMetal

OpenMetal On-Demand Private Cloud

8.2

Composite
Score

+87

Emotional
Footprint

24

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Cloud Bare Metal, OpenMetal On-Demand Private Cloud is:

Better at Support

More Respectful

Less Efficient

Less Caring

Worse at Training

Less Innovative

Alibaba Cloud

Alibaba Cloud

7.9

Composite
Score

+86

Emotional
Footprint

36

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Cloud Bare Metal, Alibaba Cloud is:

More Respectful

Less Caring

Less Efficient

Less Transparent

Harder to Use

Harder to Implement

CloudSigma

CloudSigma

7.8

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

19

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Cloud Bare Metal, CloudSigma is:

More Respectful

Better at Integrating

Less Efficient

Harder to Implement

Harder to Customize

Worse at Support

Most Popular IBM Cloud Bare Metal Comparisons