Zoho Meeting

What differentiates Zoho Meeting from other similar products?

It is, however, worth mentioning that Zoho Meeting stands out when it comes to interoperability with the entire Zoho family of applications. The data also suggests that Zoho Show presentations can be easily integrated, allowing for easy management of attendees through Zoho CRM and even using Zoho Forms for feedback purposes after the training. This ecosystem approach also helps in streamlining the work and data organization procedures.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Thanks to Zoho Meeting, we are capable of conducting virtual training meetings; the staff increases its knowledge and use of relevant digital tools. The easy scheduling of the sessions accompanying the software’s simple installation enables users to start the session with ease. This flexibility is ideal for presenting new software or explaining a marketing concept and the step-by-step process of how it can be achieved.

What do you dislike most about this product?

There is a negative aspect that is connected with the absence of breakout room option. If the training sessions include many participants, there is a possibility of dividing the participants into groups for the purpose of discussion or practice. At the moment, this means that the main session must be concluded, and several individual ones must begin instead.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

I can confidently state that our marketing team and, specifically, its members, have had a mostly positive experience using Zoho Meeting. It’s been applied for the regular skill-swapping meetings focused on SEO for beginners, complex social media promotion schemes, etc. The recording feature has been very useful to those who could not attend a live session between the team members.

What differentiates Zoho Meeting from other similar products?

As for the screen sharing, which is one of the key tools when it comes to meetings, in Zoho Meeting they are excellent. The co-annotation feature, where people can share their screens at once, is exceptional for comparing product designs or marketing materials during focus-groups. The polling feature is also good, as it provides a fast way of obtaining numbers during audit-type qualitative sessions.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

I like how reliable the software is, and how simple it is to use, specifically Zoho Meeting. The user interface is quite easy to use, which allows a seamless setup of virtual focus groups and their administration. Some of the most useful features are indeed the recording feature, since it makes it possible to go over the topics discussed and any missed information and facts. I also like the breakout room feature, where it is possible to set a larger number of participants for deeper dialogue.

What do you dislike most about this product?

All in all, Zoho Meeting is quite good, but its analytics could use some improvement.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

In reference to the shared screen feature, the packaging design variations could be demonstrated with ease. We really benefited from seeing their reactions and hearing their thoughts in the process. During one of the sessions, a participant used the free open annotation tool to highlight something on a label that he or she particularly liked. We might have missed this in a traditional setting, but that strategic mistake is not one we can afford right now. Regarding the polling feature, we were able to use it to get a snap decision on which product names people preferred.