IBM Engineering Test Management Logo
IBM Engineering Test Management Logo
IBM

IBM Engineering Test Management

Composite Score
7.2 /10
CX Score
7.4 /10
Category
IBM Engineering Test Management
7.2 /10

What is IBM Engineering Test Management?

IBM® Engineering Test Management (formerly RQM) offers comprehensive test planning, test construction, and test artifact management throughout the development lifecycle. It enables teams to meet their software quality goals and improve efficiency and accuracy in a continuous delivery environment.

Company Details


Need Assistance?

We're here to help you with understanding our reports and the data inside to help you make decisions.

Get Assistance

Awards & Recognition

IBM Engineering Test Management won the following awards in the Software Testing category

Filter By

IBM Engineering Test Management Ratings

Real user data aggregated to summarize the product performance and customer experience.
Download the entire Product Scorecard to access more information on IBM Engineering Test Management.

Product scores listed below represent current data. This may be different from data contained in reports and awards, which express data as of their publication date.

82 Likeliness to Recommend

1
Since last award

95 Plan to Renew

1
Since last award

74 Satisfaction of Cost Relative to Value


{y}
{name}

Emotional Footprint Overview

Product scores listed below represent current data. This may be different from data contained in reports and awards, which express data as of their publication date.

+83 Net Emotional Footprint

The emotional sentiment held by end users of the software based on their experience with the vendor. Responses are captured on an eight-point scale.

How much do users love IBM Engineering Test Management?

3% Negative
5% Neutral
92% Positive

Pros

  • Altruistic
  • Enables Productivity
  • Security Protects
  • Client Friendly Policies

Feature Ratings

Average 80

Audit Log

87

Test Load Balancing

86

Regulatory Compliance

86

Analytics and Reporting

83

ALM Integration

82

Test Run Workflow Manager

81

Test Case Generator

81

Test Planning

81

Test Data Management

80

Test Coverage Analysis

78

Test Script Editor

77

Vendor Capability Ratings

Average 75

Quality of Features

83

Business Value Created

80

Ease of Implementation

79

Ease of IT Administration

79

Ease of Data Integration

77

Product Strategy and Rate of Improvement

77

Breadth of Features

76

Usability and Intuitiveness

76

Vendor Support

72

Availability and Quality of Training

71

Ease of Customization

68

IBM Engineering Test Management Reviews

  • Role: C-Level
  • Industry: Technology
  • Involvement: IT Leader or Manager
Validated Review
Anonymous Reviewer

Submitted Sep 2022

Easy to use, but a bit pricey.

Likeliness to Recommend

8 /10

Pros

  • Efficient Service
  • Effective Service
  • Caring
  • Saves Time
  • Role: Industry Specific Role
  • Industry: Healthcare
  • Involvement: Business Leader or Manager
Validated Review
Anonymous Reviewer

Submitted Sep 2022

A mature product to improve any kind of business.

Likeliness to Recommend

10 /10

Pros

  • Helps Innovate
  • Performance Enhancing
  • Enables Productivity
  • Trustworthy

Cons

  • Vendor's Interest First

FREDRICK K.

  • Role: Information Technology
  • Industry: Biotechnology
  • Involvement: IT Development, Integration, and Administration
Validated Review
Verified Reviewer

Submitted May 2022

Very user friendly software and a reliable one.

Likeliness to Recommend

7 /10

What differentiates IBM Engineering Test Management from other similar products?

Reliability and user-friendliness

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Natural language processing aspect

What do you dislike most about this product?

Nothing at all

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

The best product to use, very friendly, reliable and risk free

Pros

  • Helps Innovate
  • Performance Enhancing
  • Enables Productivity
  • Trustworthy

Most Popular IBM Engineering Test Management Comparisons