Mobile Application Testing
Top Test IO Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

Test IO delivers a full range of web, mobile and IoT testing through a flexible service model. With services available on-demand, we partner with you to navigate tight delivery constraints and complex requirements to drive sustained business value—at speed and scale.

8.3

Composite
Score

+96

Emotional
Footprint

14

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to Test IO

Compare how Test IO stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

Apple

Xcode

8.7

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

56

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, Xcode is:

More Reliable

More Transparent

Less Inspiring

Worse at Training

Harder to Customize

Less Caring

Appium

Appium

8.7

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

58

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, Appium is:

More Innovative

Worse at Training

Less Inspiring

Less Caring

Harder to Customize

Harder to Implement

SmartBear Software

TestComplete

8.6

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

52

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, TestComplete is:

Less Caring

Less Inspiring

Worse at Training

Less Efficient

Less Respectful

Harder to Implement

Apple

TestFlight

8.6

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

47

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, TestFlight is:

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

Worse at Training

Harder to Customize

Less Respectful

Harder to Implement

Idera Software

TestRail

8.5

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

38

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, TestRail is:

More Reliable

Harder to Customize

Worse at Training

Less Inspiring

Harder to Implement

Less Caring

BrowserStack

BrowserStack App Automate

8.3

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

37

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, BrowserStack App Automate is:

More Innovative

Less Inspiring

Worse at Training

Harder to Implement

Less Transparent

Less Caring

Digital.ai

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

8.3

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

39

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, Digital.ai Continuous Testing is:

Harder to Customize

Worse at Training

Less Respectful

Harder to Implement

Harder to Use

Worse at Integrating

Amazon

AWS Device Farm

8.2

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

34

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, AWS Device Farm is:

More Reliable

Worse at Training

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

Harder to Customize

Harder to Implement

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

7.7

Composite
Score

+87

Emotional
Footprint

27

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, Sauce Labs is:

Less Caring

Worse at Training

Less Innovative

Harder to Customize

Harder to Implement

Less Inspiring

Kobiton

Kobiton

7.7

Composite
Score

+74

Emotional
Footprint

64

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, Kobiton is:

Less Inspiring

Worse at Training

Less Innovative

Harder to Customize

Less Reliable

Less Efficient

HeadSpin

HeadSpin

7.6

Composite
Score

+86

Emotional
Footprint

21

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, HeadSpin is:

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Worse at Training

Less Caring

Harder to Customize

Harder to Implement

Perfecto Mobile

Perfecto Mobile

7.5

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

22

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, Perfecto Mobile is:

Less Caring

Harder to Customize

Harder to Implement

Worse at Training

Harder to Use

Worse at Integrating

Testlio

Testlio

7.5

Composite
Score

+81

Emotional
Footprint

15

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, Testlio is:

Less Respectful

Less Inspiring

Less Caring

Less Efficient

Worse at Training

Less Innovative

Applause

Applause

6.9

Composite
Score

+79

Emotional
Footprint

14

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Test IO, Applause is:

Less Caring

Less Efficient

Less Inspiring

Less Respectful

Harder to Implement

Worse at Training

Most Popular Test IO Comparisons