Software Testing
Top Tricentis qTest Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

Tricentis qTest streamlines software testing in agile and DevOps environments and centralizes testing efforts across the enterprise.

7.7

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to Tricentis qTest

Compare how Tricentis qTest stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

Microsoft Corporation

Azure DevOps

8.8

Composite
Score

+91

Emotional
Footprint

173

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Azure DevOps is:

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Less Efficient

Less Inspiring

Less Reliable

Less Innovative

Selenium

Selenium

8.8

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

114

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Selenium is:

Easier to Customize

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Less Efficient

Less Caring

OpenText Corporation

OpenText ALM Octane

8.2

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

43

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, OpenText ALM Octane is:

Easier to Use

Easier to Implement

Less Inspiring

Worse at Integrating

Less Caring

Worse at Training

SmartBear Software

CucumberStudio

8.1

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

17

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, CucumberStudio is:

Easier to Use

Better at Support

Easier to Customize

Easier to Implement

Less Transparent

Worse at Training

Tricentis

Tricentis Tosca

8.1

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

30

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Tricentis Tosca is:

Easier to Use

Less Innovative

Less Inspiring

Less Respectful

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Appium

Appium

8.0

Composite
Score

+86

Emotional
Footprint

29

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Appium is:

Easier to Use

Less Efficient

Less Caring

Less Respectful

Less Reliable

Less Inspiring

Idera Software

TestRail

7.8

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

33

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, TestRail is:

Less Innovative

Worse at Training

Less Caring

Worse at Integrating

Less Transparent

Harder to Implement

Perforce Software, Inc.

Helix ALM

7.8

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Helix ALM is:

Easier to Customize

Easier to Implement

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

Worse at Support

Worse at Training

PractiTest

PractiTest

7.7

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

22

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, PractiTest is:

Less Innovative

Worse at Integrating

Less Caring

Worse at Training

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

Tricentis

SpecFlow

7.7

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

11

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, SpecFlow is:

Easier to Customize

Worse at Support

Less Efficient

Worse at Integrating

Less Innovative

Less Transparent

Inflectra

Inflectra SpiraTeam

7.6

Composite
Score

+91

Emotional
Footprint

38

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Inflectra SpiraTeam is:

Less Inspiring

Worse at Training

Less Transparent

Less Innovative

Less Respectful

Less Efficient

Parasoft

Parasoft Continuous Quality Suite

7.4

Composite
Score

+86

Emotional
Footprint

56

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Parasoft Continuous Quality Suite is:

Less Caring

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Less Reliable

Harder to Implement

Less Transparent

Akamai Technologies

CloudTest

7.3

Composite
Score

+82

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, CloudTest is:

Less Inspiring

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Less Reliable

Less Innovative

Harder to Implement

SmartBear Software

Zephyr

7.3

Composite
Score

+76

Emotional
Footprint

23

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Zephyr is:

Less Innovative

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

Less Reliable

Less Caring

Less Transparent

T-Plan

Test Automation Suite

7.3

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Test Automation Suite is:

Easier to Use

Less Innovative

Less Transparent

Worse at Integrating

Worse at Training

Harder to Customize

IBM

IBM Engineering Test Management

7.2

Composite
Score

+82

Emotional
Footprint

19

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, IBM Engineering Test Management is:

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

Less Respectful

Less Innovative

SmartBear Software

TestComplete

7.1

Composite
Score

+87

Emotional
Footprint

15

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, TestComplete is:

Less Efficient

Less Inspiring

Less Caring

Harder to Implement

Worse at Training

Less Innovative

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

7.1

Composite
Score

+81

Emotional
Footprint

11

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Sauce Labs is:

Less Innovative

Less Efficient

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

Less Reliable

Keysight Technologies

Eggplant Test Automation

7.1

Composite
Score

+88

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Tricentis qTest, Eggplant Test Automation is:

Easier to Customize

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

Less Reliable

Worse at Integrating

Less Transparent

Most Popular Tricentis qTest Comparisons