Software Testing
Top IBM Engineering Test Management Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

IBM® Engineering Test Management (formerly RQM) offers comprehensive test planning, test construction, and test artifact management throughout the development lifecycle. It enables teams to meet their software quality goals and improve efficiency and accuracy in a continuous delivery environment.

7.2

Composite
Score

+83

Emotional
Footprint

20

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to IBM Engineering Test Management

Compare how IBM Engineering Test Management stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

Microsoft Corporation

Azure DevOps

8.8

Composite
Score

+91

Emotional
Footprint

192

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Azure DevOps is:

More Transparent

More Caring

More Inspiring

Easier to Customize

Better at Training

More Efficient

Selenium

Selenium

8.8

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

139

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Selenium is:

More Caring

More Transparent

Better at Training

Easier to Customize

More Inspiring

More Efficient

Appium

Appium

8.1

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

35

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Appium is:

More Transparent

More Caring

Easier to Customize

Better at Training

More Inspiring

More Innovative

Tricentis

Tricentis Tosca

8.1

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

33

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Tricentis Tosca is:

More Transparent

More Caring

Better at Training

Easier to Customize

More Efficient

Better at Support

SmartBear Software

CucumberStudio

8.0

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

19

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, CucumberStudio is:

More Caring

More Efficient

More Respectful

More Transparent

More Innovative

Easier to Customize

OpenText Corporation

OpenText ALM Octane

7.9

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

44

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, OpenText ALM Octane is:

More Transparent

More Caring

More Efficient

More Respectful

Easier to Customize

More Inspiring

Idera Software

TestRail

7.9

Composite
Score

+91

Emotional
Footprint

37

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, TestRail is:

More Caring

More Transparent

More Inspiring

More Respectful

More Efficient

More Reliable

PractiTest

PractiTest

7.7

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

22

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, PractiTest is:

More Caring

More Transparent

More Inspiring

Better at Support

More Respectful

More Efficient

Inflectra

Inflectra SpiraTeam

7.7

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

42

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Inflectra SpiraTeam is:

More Caring

More Transparent

Easier to Customize

More Efficient

More Inspiring

More Respectful

SmartBear Software

TestComplete

7.1

Composite
Score

+88

Emotional
Footprint

15

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, TestComplete is:

More Transparent

More Caring

More Respectful

More Inspiring

Better at Support

More Innovative

Parasoft

Parasoft Continuous Quality Suite

7.1

Composite
Score

+86

Emotional
Footprint

56

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Parasoft Continuous Quality Suite is:

More Transparent

More Caring

More Efficient

More Respectful

Better at Training

Easier to Customize

SmartBear Software

Zephyr

7.0

Composite
Score

+76

Emotional
Footprint

23

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to IBM Engineering Test Management, Zephyr is:

More Caring

More Transparent

Easier to Customize

Better at Training

Less Innovative

Less Reliable

Most Popular IBM Engineering Test Management Comparisons