Software Testing
Top OpenText ALM Octane Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

OpenText™ ALM Octane includes integrated planning, continuous integration, test management, and release management. With these capabilities, Agile teams and DevOps toolchains deliver high-quality software with insight, traceability, analytics-focused end-to-end visibility, and continuous quality.

7.9

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

44

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to OpenText ALM Octane

Compare how OpenText ALM Octane stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

Microsoft Corporation

Azure DevOps

8.8

Composite
Score

+91

Emotional
Footprint

185

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, Azure DevOps is:

Better at Integrating

Less Transparent

Less Efficient

Less Caring

Less Reliable

Harder to Implement

Selenium

Selenium

8.8

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

132

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, Selenium is:

Better at Integrating

Less Transparent

Less Efficient

Less Innovative

Less Respectful

Less Reliable

Appium

Appium

8.1

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

33

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, Appium is:

Better at Integrating

Easier to Customize

Less Respectful

Less Efficient

Less Reliable

Less Caring

SmartBear Software

CucumberStudio

8.1

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

19

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, CucumberStudio is:

Better at Integrating

More Caring

Easier to Use

Better at Support

Less Transparent

Worse at Training

Tricentis

Tricentis Tosca

8.0

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

33

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, Tricentis Tosca is:

Better at Training

Less Innovative

Less Respectful

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Less Reliable

Idera Software

TestRail

7.8

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

34

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, TestRail is:

Less Innovative

Harder to Implement

Less Transparent

Harder to Customize

Less Efficient

Worse at Training

PractiTest

PractiTest

7.7

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

22

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, PractiTest is:

Less Innovative

Harder to Use

Less Transparent

Less Reliable

Harder to Implement

Less Efficient

Inflectra

Inflectra SpiraTeam

7.6

Composite
Score

+91

Emotional
Footprint

41

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, Inflectra SpiraTeam is:

Worse at Training

Less Transparent

Less Respectful

Less Reliable

Less Efficient

Harder to Use

Parasoft

Parasoft Continuous Quality Suite

7.4

Composite
Score

+86

Emotional
Footprint

56

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, Parasoft Continuous Quality Suite is:

Less Innovative

Less Caring

Harder to Implement

Less Reliable

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

SmartBear Software

Zephyr

7.3

Composite
Score

+76

Emotional
Footprint

23

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, Zephyr is:

Less Innovative

Less Efficient

Less Reliable

Less Inspiring

Less Transparent

Less Respectful

IBM

IBM Engineering Test Management

7.2

Composite
Score

+83

Emotional
Footprint

20

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, IBM Engineering Test Management is:

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Less Efficient

Less Respectful

Harder to Customize

Less Inspiring

SmartBear Software

TestComplete

7.1

Composite
Score

+88

Emotional
Footprint

15

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText ALM Octane, TestComplete is:

Less Efficient

Harder to Implement

Less Reliable

Harder to Customize

Less Innovative

Worse at Training

Most Popular OpenText ALM Octane Comparisons