Application Security Testing
Top OpenText Static Application Security Testing Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

Traditional SAST tools often require tuning and expertise, overwhelming teams with false positives. Others are easy to use, but miss vulnerabilities. OpenText™ Static Application Security Testing (Fortify) (SAST) enables DevSecOps with precise vulnerability detection, broad language support, and seamless CI/CD integration. AI-driven insights help developers prioritize and resolve vulnerabilities efficiently, reducing security risk across the SDLC.

7.3

Composite
Score

+81

Emotional
Footprint

17

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compare how OpenText Static Application Security Testing stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

GitLab Inc.

GitLab

8.9

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

92

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, GitLab is:

More Reliable

Better at Integrating

More Transparent

More Caring

Easier to Customize

Better at Support

SonarSource SA

SonarQube

8.2

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

32

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, SonarQube is:

More Transparent

Better at Integrating

More Caring

More Reliable

Easier to Customize

Less Innovative

GitGuardian

GitGuardian

8.1

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

56

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, GitGuardian is:

More Transparent

More Reliable

More Caring

Easier to Customize

Better at Integrating

Harder to Implement

Veracode

Veracode Static Analysis

7.8

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

17

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, Veracode Static Analysis is:

More Transparent

More Caring

More Reliable

Better at Integrating

More Efficient

Harder to Use

OpenText Corporation

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

7.7

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

23

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is:

More Transparent

More Reliable

More Inspiring

More Caring

Better at Integrating

Harder to Use

Synopsys

Black Duck SCA

7.5

Composite
Score

+91

Emotional
Footprint

16

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, Black Duck SCA is:

More Transparent

Better at Integrating

Less Respectful

Harder to Use

Harder to Implement

Less Efficient

Most Popular OpenText Static Application Security Testing Comparisons