Application Security Testing
Top OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

OpenText™ Dynamic Application Security Testing (Fortify) is an automated security testing solution that uncovers real, exploitable vulnerabilities by simulating live attacks against running applications, APIs, and services. Designed for modern DevSecOps teams, it prioritizes issues for root-cause analysis and integrates seamlessly via REST APIs—whether managed through an intuitive UI or fully automated in CI/CD pipelines.

7.5

Composite
Score

+96

Emotional
Footprint

12

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compare how OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

GitLab Inc.

GitLab

9.2

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

89

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, GitLab is:

More Innovative

Better at Integrating

Easier to Customize

Easier to Implement

Better at Support

Less Transparent

GitGuardian

GitGuardian

8.6

Composite
Score

+96

Emotional
Footprint

54

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, GitGuardian is:

More Innovative

Easier to Customize

Worse at Training

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

Less Caring

SonarSource SA

SonarQube

8.2

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

26

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, SonarQube is:

Better at Integrating

More Innovative

Easier to Customize

Less Inspiring

Less Reliable

Worse at Training

Synopsys

Black Duck SCA

7.9

Composite
Score

+99

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, Black Duck SCA is:

More Innovative

Easier to Customize

Easier to Implement

Less Transparent

Less Caring

Harder to Use

OpenText Corporation

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

7.6

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

11

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, OpenText Static Application Security Testing is:

More Innovative

Easier to Use

Less Transparent

Less Reliable

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

Veracode

Veracode Static Analysis

7.4

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, Veracode Static Analysis is:

More Innovative

Easier to Use

Easier to Customize

Less Inspiring

Worse at Training

Worse at Support

Most Popular OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Comparisons