Application Security Testing
Top OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

OpenText™ Dynamic Application Security Testing (Fortify) is an automated security testing solution that uncovers real, exploitable vulnerabilities by simulating live attacks against running applications, APIs, and services. Designed for modern DevSecOps teams, it prioritizes issues for root-cause analysis and integrates seamlessly via REST APIs—whether managed through an intuitive UI or fully automated in CI/CD pipelines.

7.7

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

23

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compare how OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

GitLab Inc.

GitLab

8.9

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

92

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, GitLab is:

Better at Integrating

More Reliable

More Caring

Easier to Implement

More Innovative

Less Transparent

SonarSource SA

SonarQube

8.2

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

32

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, SonarQube is:

Better at Integrating

More Caring

Easier to Customize

Easier to Use

Worse at Support

Less Inspiring

GitGuardian

GitGuardian

8.1

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

56

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, GitGuardian is:

More Caring

More Reliable

More Innovative

Easier to Customize

Worse at Support

Less Inspiring

Veracode

Veracode Static Analysis

7.8

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

17

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, Veracode Static Analysis is:

More Efficient

More Caring

More Innovative

Worse at Support

Worse at Training

Less Inspiring

Synopsys

Black Duck SCA

7.5

Composite
Score

+91

Emotional
Footprint

16

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, Black Duck SCA is:

More Innovative

Less Respectful

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Less Efficient

Less Reliable

OpenText Corporation

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

7.3

Composite
Score

+81

Emotional
Footprint

17

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, OpenText Static Application Security Testing is:

Easier to Use

Less Transparent

Less Reliable

Less Inspiring

Less Caring

Worse at Integrating

Most Popular OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Comparisons